Figure 1: A Yam wooden mask from UCL |
This painted wood mask (M.16.a) is from the Abelam
tribe of the east Sepik River district of Papua New Guinea. It was donated to UCL by Phyllis Kaberry around the 1960s.
The mask is an important item in this teaching collection. In its original context in Abelam, the mask would be an important yam ceremonial spiritual object, but would probably also be perceived as a symbol of phallic power. It is a rare and precious example of oceanic art.
The mask is an important item in this teaching collection. In its original context in Abelam, the mask would be an important yam ceremonial spiritual object, but would probably also be perceived as a symbol of phallic power. It is a rare and precious example of oceanic art.
The mask is carved out of wood (see Figure 1). After being carved and polished, it was painted with various pigments (mainly ochre, black, orange, yellow and white) in order to depict a human face.
Figure 2: Sketches indicating cracks and side view |
The mask measures about 330mm × 230mm × 96mm. It has the shape
of an irregular ellipse. Each ear has a small hole. On the top rim of the mask, there is also a
hole.
The central part of the mask is relatively flat (see Figure 2). But the reverse is concave and has a rough surface (see Figure 3).
The central part of the mask is relatively flat (see Figure 2). But the reverse is concave and has a rough surface (see Figure 3).
Figure 3: The inside of the mask |
By researching the origin of
the mask, a range of raw materials can be hypothesised. The wood is heavy
and cut from a one whole piece - this suggests that a large section of the trunk of a mature tree
might have been used here. In terms of pigments, I found that the black was probably obtained from
charcoal or soot. White might have been obtained from clay, limestone or sea shells. The yellow pigments might have come from turmeric, etc.
Figure 4: Cracks |
The mask is in stable condition but would profit from specialist conservation attention. There are old
cracks spreading through the surface and the pigments are flaking and powdery.
Figure 5: Scratches on the surface |
There are also some scratches on the painting (see Figure 4 and 5). Because of the friability of the paint layer, the mask should be handled as little as possible.
Photographs by author. Please do not use without authorization.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Baraldi, P. et al. 2012.
Study of the Technique and of the Materials of a 19th-Century Polychrome Wood
Mask from Papua New Guinea. Archaeometry, 56(2), Pp.313-330.
Coupaye,
L. 2013. Growing artefacts, displaying
relationships : Yams, art and technology amongst the Nyamikum Abelam of Papua
New Guinea. New York : Berghahn Books, Pp 8-20.
Coupaye,
L. 2009. Ways of Enchanting. Journal of Material
Culture, 14(4), Pp. 433-458.
Ewaoceanicgallery.com. 2016. Abelam Yam
Mask Blue Pigment Oceanic Art Papua New Guinea Art. [online] Available at:
http://www.ewaoceanicgallery.com/msk_0090.html [Accessed 11 Mar. 2016].
Florian, M., Kronkright, Dale Paul, &
Norton, Ruth E. 1990. The conservation of
artifacts made from plant materials. Marian del Rey, California: Getty
Conservation Institute. Pp. 14-23
Greub,
S., & Tribal Art Centre. 1985. Authority
and ornament : Art of the Sepik River, Papua New Guinea. Basel: Tribal Art
Centre, Edition Greub. Pp. 19-31
Hill,
R. 2001. Traditional paint from Papua New Guinea: Context, materials and
techniques, and their implications for conservation. The Conservator, 25(1), Pp. 49-61.
No comments:
Post a Comment